100-300 lens choice: Pana or Oly?

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
Anders W
Forum ProPosts: 10,816
Like?
Re: Eating my hat
In reply to texinwien, 4 months ago

texinwien wrote:

Anders W wrote:

texinwien wrote:

Anders W wrote:

You might want to really test your copy to see whether you have a problem. Unfortunately, the risk of getting a poor or so-so copy is rather high in my experience, not just with this particular lens but with any. You might want to have a look at the thread to which I link below (not just the OP) for some ideas about how to proceed:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/42257923

I'll do it. Thanks for the link and the instructions on how to test. Was just reading instructions from you on testing lenses in another thread last night, but haven't had a chance to try it out yet (the upside down / right side up method).

As I pointed out, you should be aware that a 100-300 at its long end cannot be expected to do as well as it does at its short end, nor as well as a good standard zoom (e.g., the 14-45) does as its long end. That holds for pretty much any lens of this caliber (70-300 or whatever), not just for the partular lens we are talking about.

I'll have a look at all of my lenses and see what I find. If I come across anything interesting, I'll share it, and whatever I find with the 100-300mm, I'll share it in this thread.

tex

One thing I forgot to mention when it comes to testing the 100-300. In my experience, it is impossible to get tack-sharp shots with this lens at the long end, even from a tripod with anti-shock delay enabled, in the range of shutter speeds where shutter shock is a problem. While your equipment (camera, lens, tripod) may work differently than mine, you might want to make sure to use shutter speeds outside the range between 1/20 and 1/200 to be on the safe side and very stable surroundings in every regard if you go below 1/20 rather than above 1/200. It is very instructive to turn on highest EVF/OLED magnification with this lens at the long end mounted on a tripod and see just how sensitive it is to the smallest of impacts. When testing on the wodden floor of my living room, for example, I make sure to leave the living room before exposure begins.

I haven't finished systematically testing my 100-300mm lens yet, but I did put it on a tripod today (for the first time) and shoot a number of test images. I shot at 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300mm once per aperture from widest possible at the particular aperture through f/8.0.

I used ISO 200, 12-second timer, 1/8 second anti-shock, manual focus and activated the shutter via the touch screen. I was pleasantly surprised at the sharpness at every focal length and every aperture I tried. As expected, 300mm was softer, and f/8.0 was generally sharper. All were sharper than I'd expected to see, so it must have been my technique to blame in earlier handheld tests. I've only had this thing a few weeks, and really haven't had the kind of light I'd like to have for handheld shooting. The only other potential thing to check is focusing on something farther away. I was focusing on a sheet of newspaper ~7-10 meters from the camera.

That'll teach me to speak from my gut.

tex

PS most of my exposures were quite long, several well under 1/20, since I was shooting indoors and didn't have the best light. I stayed very still before and during each exposure. I may add a couple of test shots to my gallery and share them in this thread.

Glad to hear you have a good copy after all tex. And yes, you do have to keep the shutter speed up when shooting this lens hand-held if you want to see what the lens is really good for. I try to keep it at 1/320 at least at the long end, with OIS and IBIS enabled of course.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow