Dynamic Range Really isn't as important as you are lead to believe.

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
Dheorl
Contributing MemberPosts: 946
Like?
Re: Dynamic Range Really isn't as important as you are lead to believe.
In reply to mpgxsvcd, 4 months ago

mpgxsvcd wrote:

Dheorl wrote:


No, but as you say, it reduces the amount of clipping. And that's an improvement of 2 stops in 4 generations. Wait another 4 generations and we might have another 2 stop improvement and so on. Keep on going, companies start to compete on dynamic range once they've all got to a point where the number of megapixels and speed of autofocus is just stupid and we might eventually get to a point where you can get 20 stops of dynamic range in a camera. Even if each generation reduces the area of an image that is clipped for a given scene I'd be happy.

Are you honestly trying to say that's it's not needed or worthwhile. If I had the choice between double the megapixels or double the dynamic range I know which one I'd take.

It is going to be hard to go from slightly more than 12 stops to more than 14 stops in a 14 bit or less file.

I never said that a dynamic range improvement in the sensor is a bad thing. It is good when the old camera would clip and the new one would not. Since there has been about 1 stop difference between generations that really isn't as big a deal as the camera manufactures have lead us to believe.

I never said anything about megapixels. I would much rather them give me a 9 megapixel GH3 than an 18 megapixel GH3 with 1 extra stop of Dynamic range.

I simply contend that the difference between dynamic range of each generation of camera is not as useful as everyone thinks. It is very rare that a camera like the GH3 would save your image completely over a GH2 if dynamic range is the only issue.

And what about when cameras start to use files with more than 14 bits? Computers are constantly getting faster, we've already gone from 12 bit to 14 bit for DSLRs, digital MF shoots at 16 bit these days. As I say the D800 (and apparently even the RX100) are already at or above 14 stops of dynamic range.

I'd consider an landscape which has less area that is blown to always be preferable to one with a larger area which is blown.

Just a quick recap, our OP said that noone needed as large a dynamic range as they think they do... You still stand by that statement?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow