Dynamic Range Really isn't as important as you are lead to believe.

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
Bob Tullis
Forum ProPosts: 22,312
Like?
Re: If you say so.
In reply to mpgxsvcd, 4 months ago

mpgxsvcd wrote:

Bob Tullis wrote:

mpgxsvcd wrote:

Everyone talks about the newer cameras having more dynamic range. While that is true how often do you really use that much dynamic range?

A lot. And within that I push/pull the tones a great deal. It's allowed me to forgo HDR except for the most extreme cases - and even when I think I need HDR, I find I can often pick one of the exposures in the series to develop, and not have to resort to the HDR blend.

--

...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.

I see post after post that says not enough dynamic range can be corrected in post processing. Again nothing you do in post processing can fix a clipped signal. Dynamic Range implies a clipped signal.

I think that this is the true issue. The camera manufactures have lead everyone to believe that dynamic range really means exposure control. It couldn’t be further from the truth.

Better DR means more post-exposure control.   Shooting for the sensor often results in a poor rendering, but the practice is done to get the best signal the sensor can manage to handle.   With JPGs one primarily shoots for the appearance of the exposure, with RAW one shoots with the sensor's signal data as the primary consideration.

--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow