|
Olympus 75-300 Mk1 vs. Olympus FT 70-300
4 months ago
|
Interested in user reports from those who have owned both. With the price drop to $550 and minor improvements, the 75-300 MkII is now of some interest for my E-M5. I had the FT 70-300 and found it okay at the long end when the gods were smiling.
Based on SLRGear's tests of the 75-300 Mk1 and FT 70-300, the former performed better at 300mm, being quite a bit sharper:
http://slrgear.com/reviews/zproducts/olympus75-300f48-67m/tloader.htm
http://slrgear.com/reviews/zproducts/olympus70-300f4-56/tloader.htm
Does this hold up in actual practice?
--
Sailin' Steve
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |