
|
Re: Is the 18-200 THAT bad?
In reply to Howard,
4 months ago
|
Howard wrote:
... I have no use for this lens, but I have been contemplating getting a kit for my wife (the camera would be a T4i/650). Is this lens so bad that it's not even worth considering? ...
Being it's a kit for your wife, and you're getting the T4i, may want to consider getting the 18-135 STM (i.e., not the 18-135 IS). The T4i with the 18-135 STM wil allow AF when shooting video, it's smaller/lighter than the 18-200, and uses smaller (less expensive) 67mm filters.
The only reason I have the 18-200 IS is because of the price of D60 & 18-200 IS Kit from Costco. As with the other 18-200mm type lens you can get good results when stopped down to f/8 - f/11. When I want to travel light with a one-lens solution I use the 18-200 IS on the T2i. If you're aware of the lens' weakness and strengths should be able to get good results.
Unless you intend on making prints larger than 8" x 10", pics should be just fine when viewing at normal distance. So good tips/info not getting to hung-up on lens sharpness tests see the article: Lens Sharpness
You can find plenty of tests on the 18-200 IS with sample images to view/download just by doing a Google search for "Canon 18-200 IS Review".
Below is with the 18-200 IS @ 200mm
FYI can do some comparisons between the 18-200 IS and other lenses here: ISO Crops
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |