105mm f/2.8 Micro VR...Japanese model more desirable?

Started Jan 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
Senior MemberPosts: 2,237Gear list
Re: Yes, but here's why
In reply to AllOtherNamesTaken, Jan 30, 2013

AllOtherNamesTaken wrote:

Again, I don't believe one lens is actually better than another, but that doesn't matter because enough people think MIJ is superior that that you won't get as much for the MIC when you try selling it used.

Well if you don't believe this, and if you are actually buying the lens to take pictures with (rather than as some sort of obscure investment that you may or may not get your money out of at some indeterminate date in the future), then why would you

  1. Give up a 5-year warranty? and
  2. Take the risk that the used lens has defects/issues?

BTW: I have the MIJ version. Good to know I could sell it for a premium, I guess...

 paulski66's gear list:paulski66's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Nikon D600 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow