Venting re" Full Frame

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
Joseph S Wisniewski
Forum ProPosts: 33,504
Like?
Second the 55mm, and about that 60-250mm...
In reply to SungiBr, 4 months ago

SungiBr wrote:

Mike Arledge wrote:

The 43 is slightly too short for serious beauty headshots, and the 60 is too long for my studio sometimes depending on how much of the model's figure needs to be included in the frame...

Maybe you could take a look on the DA* 55mm f1,4 . It earned some good reviews and is rated on photozone as a good performer regarding bokeh.

Quote from photozone

"is equivalent to about 85mm whereas the depth-of-field capability resembles a f/2 lens"

"There's a bit of an outlining effect in out-of-focus highlights at f/1.4 but highlight discs are pretty perfect at f/2 and f/2.8. The blur quality is also very high..."

That is the lens I was going to recommend. I only shot it once, but I liked it. I also like the Voigtlander 58mm, but manual focus isn't for everyone...

There's something else to consider. The 60-250mm isn't actually a 60-250mm. Camera makers typically round a lot in their specs. A lens that's a 62-245mm can legally be labeled a 60-250mm. A 55mm prime is going to actually be 55mm. and the difference between that and the 62-63mm you don't like is substantial.

Oh, and that rounding thing also affects 50mm f1.4 lenses: I've measured Nikon and Pentax ones at 52mm. Almost all lenses are off in the "easy" direction. It's easier to make a 52mm f1.4 than a 50mm. It's easier to make a 22mm than a 20mm. Easier to make a 280mm than a 300mm.

--
Rahon Klavanian 1912-2008. Armenian genocide survivor, amazing cook, scrabble master, and loving grandmother. You will be missed. Ciao! Joseph www.swissarmyfork.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow