Focal length question... 35 and 50 necessary?

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
sigala1
Senior MemberPosts: 2,049
Like?
splitting the difference
In reply to Elemental Photography, 4 months ago

Elemental Photography wrote:

I use my 20mm lens in quite a different fashion than my 14mm lens. I also shoot a range of subjects, including street, landscape, portraits, etc. For me, it is necessary to have both a normal and a wide option so I can compose with different perspectives.

That said, with both a 14 and a 20 in my bag, I don't see the need to split the difference and get a 17. I have friends who prefer the 17mm look to 14mm, but that is entirely subjective.

--
A photograph is a creative interpretation of reality.

And I was thinking that I already have 14mm f/2.5 and 25mm f/1.4, so I don't need a 17mm f/1.8 or anything else in between there?
Maybe 17 and 20mm are for wimps, afraid to be normal but also afraid to be true wide angle?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow