Olympus XZ-10

technic wrote:

in that case it seems way too expensive, just like the XZ-2 is too expensive in its class. Maybe they think they can ask that much because they have one of the brightest lenses for a 1/2.3"sensor?

I don't see how the XZ-10 is going to compete with e.g. the Canon S110 that has similar price (S110 proved too noisy for me, don't want to know how XZ-10 images look ...).