How many would choose stellar 50mm f/2 IS over a mediocre 50mm f/1.4/1.2?

Started Jan 20, 2013 | Discussions thread
akustykmagmanetpl
Contributing MemberPosts: 606Gear list
Like?
and this proves what?
In reply to MICHAEL_61, Jan 29, 2013

that 50/1.2 (or whatever that is) can produce pictures that even at cellphone screen size is not sharp...

vrooom... that's the sound of me heading off to a store to dump $1200+ to get this rather than spending $5 on an old M42 lens which does exactly the same. pardon... old Pentacons are probably a bit sharper...

I mean... honestly... this photo isn't sharp at all, and bokeh (which probably is fine with this lens) is tough to be judged (unsharp is not the same as bokeh). not to mention that the photo is pretty bad argument to justify the price of 50/1.2. seriously, I'd not spend this much money to make this kind of photos...

 akustykmagmanetpl's gear list:akustykmagmanetpl's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow