Forum indexNikon SLR Lens TalkChange forum

Why 18 35???

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

Italosvedese

Junior Member • Posts: 32

Like?

Re: Price...

In reply to MoreorLess, 4 months ago

Ok there is 3-400$ difference but do you the performances are gonna be that different??? If so then the 18 35 should perform pretty avarage and so be pretty expensive...

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Why 18 35???	Italosvedese	4 months ago	1
Price...	MoreorLess	4 months ago
Re: Price...	Italosvedese	4 months ago
Re: Price...	Tom Ames	4 months ago
Re: Price...	Joe Porto	4 months ago	1
Re: Price...	paulski66	4 months ago	4
Re: Price...	Guidenet	4 months ago
You can't take a picture with a lens that isn't with you	just Tony	4 months ago
Re: You can't take a picture with a lens that isn't with you	Guidenet	4 months ago
Re: You can't take a picture with a lens that isn't with you	just Tony	4 months ago
Re: You can't take a picture with a lens that isn't with you	Guidenet	4 months ago
Re: You can't take a picture with a lens that isn't with you	just Tony	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	coudet	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	Joe Porto	4 months ago	1
Re: Why 18 35???	RKBouknight	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	Joe Porto	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	eths	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	Guidenet	4 months ago
But don't forget	just Tony	4 months ago
Re: But don't forget	Guidenet	4 months ago
Re: But don't forget	just Tony	4 months ago
Re: But don't forget	Guidenet	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	M Lammerse	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	HSway	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	eths	4 months ago
Because I am so happy looking forward to buy it!!!	Roland Schulz	4 months ago
Re: Because I am so happy looking forward to buy it!!!	MoreorLess	4 months ago
Re: Because I am so happy looking forward to buy it!!!	Tom Ames	4 months ago
Re: Because I am so happy looking forward to buy it!!!	Guidenet	4 months ago
Re: Because I am so happy looking forward to buy it!!!	paulski66	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	Rick77	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	paulski66	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	Neocon	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	PatMann	4 months ago	1
Re: Why 18 35???	Raymond Cho	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	MoreorLess	4 months ago
Re: Why 18 35???	sd40	4 months ago
Photography Life (Mansurovs) has published a comparison of the MTF charts	paulski66	4 months ago
Light weight. Price. NT	Steve Bingham	4 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Why Canon made 1Dx best specification ... II	89
I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	75
My first wedding with OMD	73
Leica entering m4/3?	60
Is Apple getting people by their brain-balls?	53
can you tell the IQ/ISO difference game: ...	51
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	48
2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7	41
Seeking ways of tracking birds in flight with ...	39
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	38
Hassy's Lunar gets real	38
Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens	38
Pentax — a Japanese Leica? Not really ...	36
New Forum?	36
Inconceivable! Nikon can't repair my 80-200 AFS!	34
Panasonic G6. It really has an old, bad sensor?	34
What might go wrong with GX2	33
Would you take your D800E and lenses on a trip ...	32
Decision making on starting over...	31
Smallest case/bag for X-E1	29