10 hours ago
1
|
A better path to DR for landscapes
In reply to pentaxfun,
4 months ago
|
pentaxfun wrote:
... but, when I saw that there was a dramatic difference in Dynamic Range scores, and that this is supposed to be a crucial metric for those who are into landscape photography (which is my favorite form of photography personally), this gave me pause.If you're shooting landscapes, you can capture several shots at varying exposures, and merge them using any of several excellent High Dynamic Range applications. HDR will yield files of much greater DR than you could get with any single exposure using any camera.
Thus, for landscape work, I don't see differences in DR as being very important.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
