how many $$$ have legacy lenses saved for you? and aren't they fun?

Started Jan 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Regular MemberPosts: 337Gear list
Re: how many $$$ have legacy lenses saved for you? and aren't they fun?
In reply to mgibbs, Jan 28, 2013

Personally, I pleased to use legacy lenses. And it really saves the money. I started to deal with it when bought E-PL1 with kit 14-42 (first version). Since this lens is a suck, I was extremely disappointed and started to look around for something better. First was Helios 44-3, than couple of Takumars, than Minoltas etc.. Now for me 50mm lens with f-number more than 1.4 is not attractive et all. I still think than modern lenses for mirroless cameras (50mm in particular) are overpriced with IQ slightly above average. And, from my point of view – overdesigned. Why 50mm prime should have 10 lenses in 9 groups (SEL-50F18) or 9 lenses in 8 groups (M. Zuiko 45mm f1.8)? Both have f1.8 ONLY!!!! Ridiculous… And old boring Planars (or its derivatives) still can do very good work:

 YuriS's gear list:YuriS's gear list
Olympus PEN E-PL1 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4.0-5.6 Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow