how many $$$ have legacy lenses saved for you? and aren't they fun?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
s_grins
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,278
Like?
Re: You didn't lose any $$....
In reply to tedolf, 4 months ago

tedolf wrote:

s_grins wrote:

I do not think that buying legacy lenses saves money. I think it is waist of money. Except of Sigma 2.8/90 MACRO, I do not use the rest of my collection (8 more lenses)

By my estimates, I've lost approx. $600 on legacy lenses and adapters

--
Looking for equilibrium...

assuming you paid FMV for those lenses, you should be able to sell them for about what you paid for them.

Can't say that about your native lenses, can you?

Another huge advantage of legacy lenses.

They really don't cost you anything if you don't like them.

Tedolph

$60 for lens + $20 for adapter. What about adapters?

--
Looking for equilibrium...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow