how many $$$ have legacy lenses saved for you? and aren't they fun?

mgibbs wrote:

if i were "working" with MF lenses i would agree. but i am only playing around, and i chiefly use them once i have used my native lenses (often with flash, as they are slower (14mm 2.5, 14-140mm 4.0-5.8) to get the shots i "need", and then i break out the legacy glass to have some fun with a MF challenge. and then, there are events, such as dance recitals and plays, where the slowness of my 14-140 won't do, in which case the legacy glass is a lifesaver, as again, for my uses, i can't justify spending thousands to shoot 2 recitals and 2 school plays a year.

so far, i'm the only legacy glass fan! any of my fellow travellers out there?