OM-D E-M5 a huge disappointment for me...

W A Stewart wrote:

Admittedly my low light shots haven't been at more than 45mm (the prime) or 50mm (the kit 12-50 - not a bad lens but replaced with the 12-35). However, I've never noticed the problem. I recently shot a low light event for a pro photographer (Nikon user) who was receiving an honor. We didn't notice anything. (EM5 and 12-35 in that case; wished I'd brought a second body and longer lens as well, though.)

The main advantage of the camera, as usual, were its inconspicuous appearance, low noise at up to 1600, and very good SAF.

--
W Alex Stewart