|
Re: Lens choice. Sigma 10-20 4-5.6 or Nikkor 18-55 for wideangle on D7000
In reply to Molando,
4 months ago
|
Molando wrote:
Hello Experts,
I am looking for a lens to take landscape pictures. Though I can afford the sigma 10-20 (£340), if a Nikkor 18-55 (£70) is 90% there, or will be much more useful then will go that way.
My current lenses are the great 1.8 35mm, a Nikkor 50-200mm 4-5.6, and the 100mm macro which people here helped me choose.
I belonged to a walking group, and could always spot the new people, they would have every walking gadget that you can imagine, and sometimes stand out in lycra.
So far have only purchased a few useless items. Including a camera bag that would never wear around where I live, as it screams out 'Mug me, I have an expensive camera'.
Trying not to become the photographic version of the lycra fellow, and only get equipment that really helps, and keep the costs down a bit.
For general photography and landscapes. Would the 10-20 sigma be much better than the 18-55 at 18? Or will the 35mm be fine in 99% of cases?
Thank you.
Those are two very different lenses. The difference between 10mm and 18, is huge. Based on the lenses you have, I would recommend getting BOTH! That way, you would be covered from 10mm to 200 and 18-55 is fairly inexpensive but would fill in nicely in the 20-55 gap you would have were you to get the 10-20.
--
I lug my photo equipment everywhere. Is it heavy? Sure. Is it uncomfortable and cumbersome? Absolutely. Is it often an inconvenience? You bet. But is it all worth it? Maybe.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |