The X-Factor of Fudging ISO

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
Emacs23
Regular MemberPosts: 302
Like?
Re: The X-Factor of Fudging ISO
In reply to seukel, 4 months ago

seukel wrote:

Davidgilmour wrote:

bigpigbig wrote:

By these rules, Fuji could call ISO 100, ISO 204,800 and say "look how good our high sensitivity is" "our ISO 204,800 is equal to Canon's ISO 100" but then the jig would be up. Instead they choose to hide the fact with a slight adjustment. No, no, no.

Exactly. This is called "cheating" in real life.

Cheating? The OP called it Fudging! That is not the same semantically speaking! And what about smudging?

I actually like this word, it resembles Fuji. This company should be called in this way IMO

Fudgi X-Trans BS, etc.

Edited 4 months ago by Emacs23
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow