22 hours ago
|
Re: 50-200 swd or not for mFT
In reply to Johann D,
4 months ago
|
Johann D wrote:
jim stirling wrote:
Skeeterbytes wrote:
Want to add that either version works brilliantly with the EC14, giving 283mm reach at a one-stop loss. Definitely adds to the lens' utility.
Cheers,
Rick
Thanks Rick , I wonder why they haven't given us tele-convertors with mFT
Jim
When I asked that question a few months back, I was carpet bombed with ridicule. Why would I want a TC, when there is that "wonderful" digital .jpg 2X magnify...
You can all speculate on whether the SWD will work better and faster with a camera that is just a concept in the mind of some Oly engineer...
...or buy the mk1 and use it on the OMD...
...Or deal with "jitter focus" with the SWD. As was mentioned, the SWD has better OOF with better shutter blades.
I agree it is a bit of a gamble , but for my use I do not mind using manual focus till the camera with PDAF hopefully comes along.
Jim
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
