Forum indexMicro Four Thirds TalkChange forum

First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread

Forum

bugbait

Contributing Member • Posts: 506

Like?

Re: Ignore review

In reply to Dave Sanders, 4 months ago

Thank you Scott, indeed sharp details is what it is all about.

All tools benefit from customized technique, sounds like the 60 f 2.8 just requires some extra tender loving care. That will likely yield some nice bright subjects.

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	NZ Scott	4 months ago
It appears that your lens. . . .	MaxB1	4 months ago
Re: It appears that your lens. . . .	Jeff Tokayer	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	cosmoxl	4 months ago	1
Macro lenses really require manual focusing, anyway	Isabel Cutler	4 months ago
Re: Macro lenses really require manual focusing, anyway	NZ Scott	4 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	Isabel Cutler	4 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	Mjankor	4 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	JamieTux	4 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	Mjankor	4 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	JamieTux	3 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: I agree that tripods are a nuisance outside...	gardenersassistant	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	helimech	4 months ago	1
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	NZ Scott	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	helimech	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: trolls	mchnz	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	Mjankor	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	Optical1	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	bugbait	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	NZ Scott	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	Optical1	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	bugbait	4 months ago
Ignore review	Dave Sanders	4 months ago	1
Re: Ignore review	bugbait	4 months ago
Re: Ignore review	Iskender	4 months ago
There is a point ( or two )	Franka T.L.	4 months ago	2
are there any tele macros that work well on m 4/3?	mlmusto	4 months ago
Re: There is a point ( or two )	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	stefano888	4 months ago
Ignore the outlier!	maljo@inreach.com	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	Brian Wadie	4 months ago	1
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	revio	4 months ago
#3...	dotborg	4 months ago
Re: First negative review of the M. Zuiko 60/2.8 Macro	GrinderJohnII	3 months ago	1

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Mirrorless Takes Another Hammering	101
Am I the only one who doesn't care about video ...	68
Why Canon Made 1Dx Best Specification , Low ...	52
Full Frame Pentax mystery deepens....	42
Advise for a walk around lens for K5?	37
Received my Nikon 300mm F4 today	37
Local area for Play	35
EP5 or OMD EM5 (Ignoring Price) For Beginner?	32
So... I'm all but convinced that I'm going D800	31
Olympus 2012 imaging financial results	31
NX300 & NX2000 source code	30
Do have canon A better cheap lens instead of ...	29
V1 - Deal of the Century!	27
shooting raw	26
Suggestions for small camera - Fujifilm X20 or ?	26
How many of you guys have a back up camera?	26
Has this photo lost all hope?	24
Olympus financial results for 2012 fiscal year	24
A Year with the OM-D E-M5	24
First photos with 9-18mm	24