Why is the EM5 so much more popular than the GH3?

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
nzmacro
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,099
Like?
Check this guy out, nothing hidden
In reply to Dave Sanders, 4 months ago

Dave Sanders wrote:

nzmacro wrote:

stimmer wrote:

The size of the EM5 gives it a very specific niche in which you can take very stealth photos without people noticing, and it's so light you can carry it as a second camera with no issues. Not saying the GH3 is big either, but the perception is there.

This always makes me smile. Why do you guys feel the need to be sneaky, underhanded and hide when taking street shots. Are you scared of getting thumped ??

No, not at all. Anyone who tried would find the thumping would most likely go the other way, or at the very minimum I'd steal their ice cream and eat it in front of them.

If you are scared of getting thumped, then you are doing something wrong or you must feel like you are doing wrong, hence the need to...... hide.

Why not stand up and just take shots ??

Indeed!

All the best and never understood it. I would call it dishonest photography, hey just an opinion

And a largely incorrect opinion. I enjoy candid photography, and candid street photography at that. By definition, if someone notices you, it is not candid. Henri Cartier-Bresson went to great lengths for stealth, including famously wrapping his Leica's in black or using a handkerchief to pretend he was blowing his nose...or even standing on a ladder and hiding around corners. People like Paul Strand and Helen Levitt documented life unnoticed from the sidelines as well. William Eggleston's popularization of colour photography had much to do with his ability to capture mundane, private moments and make them feel immediate and real. Phillip-Lorca diCorcia's outstanding 'Heads' series takes capturing an unsuspecting subject to a sort of stage-managed brilliance.

Candid street photography has long been the domain of stealth, of taped-up logos, waist-level finders and zone focusing. And it has not been done by bearded, trench-coated photographic flashers but by the greats, the giants of photography. The urge to capture life and life's emotions unvarnished and unnoticed is a noble one. The 'decisive moment' doesn't involve consent and a signed model release, sorry.

I don't know if you meant it to come off that way, but your pretentious derision of a style of photography you feel to be 'dishonest' or, likely, beneath you, is fatuous at best and, at worst, woefully ignorant of a large part of the foundation of photography. When lots of the world's most famous photographers and a whole slew of smart folk on this forum do something with such purpose, perhaps it is best to assume they may know something you don't rather than to assume that they are sneaky, underhanded, dishonest or scared of being thumped.

Or stick to courageous pursuit of birds and macros, for it is most certain you are at no risk of being thumped.

-- Dave Sanders

LOL, fair enough Dave.

Now check this guy out and yes IMO, he is far more honest about what he is doing

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/fashion/8158184/No-photos-please-we-re-from-Palmy

Nothing hidden and up front about it. So the question is, which type do I feel is more honest about it. Hmmm. That guy makes me think of two different types out there, the hidden and unhidden. Which do I prefer.

All the best.

Danny.

--
Birds and macro. NEX and m4/3
http://www.birdsinaction.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nzmacro/

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow