The X-Factor of Fudging ISO

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
LaFonte
Senior MemberPosts: 2,193
Like?
Re: The X-Factor of Fudging ISO
In reply to Zardoz, 4 months ago

Zardoz wrote:

Because there is a significant amount of information in the (12-14 bit, lossless) raws that's missing in the (8-bit, lossily compressed) JPEGs. That matters to people who have high standards for their work.

Both software and camera starts with the same RAW data and ends up with 8bit image at the end. The benefit of doing it in software is that you have full control over the process. It used to be paramount because the in-camera RAW->8bit was always lacking in comparison to what you can do manually - largely for noise and wrong exposure where we need pull or push.

But in case of Fuji, this may be not so. Here were are applying old habit that was necessary for other cameras to a camera where it may not give much benefit. A software processed xpro1 RAW image may not look significantly better than the jpeg, at best you may end up with the same but with much more elaborate process.

If the goal is only a normal color correction without need to pull or push exposure then 8bit->cc->8bit give as good results as 14bits->cc->8bit because color correction only changes linearity but doesn't introduce clipping.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow