The X-Factor of Fudging ISO

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Charles C Lloyd
Senior MemberPosts: 1,104
Like?
Re: The X-Factor of Fudging ISO
In reply to nawknai, 5 months ago

nawknai wrote:

seukel wrote:

aleksanderpolo wrote:

But how they label their ISO has nothing to do with metering, no?

This holds true with the average thermal expansion coefficient to 1.75 (1.62 to 2.0), you will stop down with the third quarter of the exposure. It's repeatable between the price impacts. These values are lower than the exposure ISO 200-1600, but the output is close to two-thirds of the value of the exposure values, a rather small one. Amend the ISO 125 and ISO 200 and ISO 3200 is replaced by the right hand. By the way the voice in such a way is not to exceed the factor 10.

Wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwut?

I think its the dual cross firing agitator effect coming into play.  Either that, or this response was originally written in Esperanto and automatically translated with google translate into English.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow