Forum indexMicro Four Thirds TalkChange forum

12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

Shirozina

Regular Member • Posts: 130

Like?

Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens

In reply to mpgxsvcd, 5 months ago

mpgxsvcd wrote:

Shirozina wrote:

I have reason ( as many others do) to print images at a 1:1 ratio of the sensor pixels with the printers native resolution and thus viewing at 100% on a monitor ( 1:1 ratio of sensor and screen pixels) is actually both useful and relevant.

You sound like someone who claims to always strive for perfection but in reality has no idea how to achieve the optimal results.

--
GH3, Hacked GH2, and Full Spectrum GF1 Sample movies
http://www.youtube.com/user/mpgxsvcd#play/uploads
GH3 Tips and Tricks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIMdxoGbNXU
GH2 Setup Walk through
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uROQbbiiO2I
http://vimeo.com/user442745
GH3, GH2, GF1 Pictures
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/4222674355/albums

You are coming over loud and clear as someone who is looking for an argument and is making a lot of assumptions from very little evidence. Best I don't respond anymore.

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago	6
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	rpm40	5 months ago	5
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	RobbieV	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	ryan2007	5 months ago	2
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago	3
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	jkrumm	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Skeeterbytes	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	OniMirage	5 months ago
12-35 impressive as a landscape lens	sgoldswo	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 impressive as a landscape lens	OniMirage	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Savas Kyprianides	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	ARB1	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	ryan2007	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Panasonic defense hour	Francis Carver	5 months ago	3
Re: Panasonic defense hour	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: Panasonic defense hour	sgoldswo	5 months ago	1
Re: Panasonic defense hour	ryan2007	5 months ago	1
Re: Panasonic defense hour	Jeff Tokayer	5 months ago	1
Re: Panasonic defense hour	NuFonaut	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	ohmydentist	5 months ago	4
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	OMaster Dee	5 months ago	4
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	bluelemmy	5 months ago	4
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago	2
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	2
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	peevee1	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sean000	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Bob Tullis	5 months ago	2
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Bob Tullis	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	amtberg	5 months ago
DxO vs ACR?	sigala1	5 months ago
Re: DxO vs ACR?	Bob Tullis	5 months ago
Re: DxO vs ACR?	sigala1	5 months ago
Re: DxO vs ACR?	Bob Tullis	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Timbukto	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	CrisPhoto	5 months ago
Thanks good info here	sigala1	5 months ago	2
Re: Thanks good info here	dav1	5 months ago	3
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Timbukto	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sean000	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	John.Laninga	5 months ago	4
Here is an alternative ...	forpetessake	5 months ago
Re: Here is an alternative ...	Mingjai	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	inasir1971	5 months ago	2
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sgoldswo	5 months ago	2
My 12-35 is impressive as a landscape lens...	ernieF	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sigala1	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sgoldswo	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Dawindyk	5 months ago
OP: Indeed, some examples would be appreciated, n/t	IsabelS	5 months ago
Re: OP: Indeed, some examples would be appreciated, n/t	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: OP: Indeed, some examples would be appreciated, n/t	Dawindyk	5 months ago
Re: OP: Indeed, some examples would be appreciated, n/t	sigala1	5 months ago
Re: OP: Indeed, some examples would be appreciated, n/t	benarden	5 months ago
Re: OP: Indeed, some examples would be appreciated, n/t	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sgoldswo	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sigala1	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sgoldswo	5 months ago
What gives you the right to call a kit lens user "some shmuck" sigala1?	Hen3ry	5 months ago
dude...	sigala1	5 months ago	1
You were busy hanging nasty stuff on kit lens users	Hen3ry	5 months ago
Come on Geoff......	tedolf	5 months ago	1
There is a reason...	ryanshoots	5 months ago	1
IQ best at f4 on all m43 lenses	peppermonkey	5 months ago
Re: IQ best at f4 on all m43 lenses	sigala1	5 months ago
Why bother?	String	5 months ago	1
Re: Why bother?	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: Why bother?	String	5 months ago
Re: Why bother?	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: Why bother?	String	5 months ago	1
Re: Why bother?	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: Why bother?	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	2
Re: Why bother?	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	sigala1	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	amtberg	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	mpgxsvcd	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Anders W	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	amtberg	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	forpetessake	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Sabatia	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Would you not recommend the 12-35 for the OM-D? Then what to use for landscapes?	webservants	5 months ago
Message to Shirozina	Big Ga	5 months ago
Re: Message to Shirozina	jim stirling	5 months ago
Re: Message to Shirozina	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: Have you got a bad copy ?	axlotl	5 months ago
Re: Have you got a bad copy ?	Big Ga	5 months ago
Re: Lumix 12-35 at 12mm f2.8 and f4	axlotl	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	peevee1	5 months ago
Let's just face reality.....	tedolf	5 months ago	1
Re: Let's just face reality.....	amtberg	5 months ago
You can't compare a FULL FRAME lens to m43 lens	sigala1	5 months ago	1
Re: You can't compare a FULL FRAME lens to m43 lens	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: Let's just face reality.....	idiotekniQues	5 months ago
Re: Let's just face reality.....	Savas Kyprianides	5 months ago
Re: Let's just face reality.....	Tvaclavek	5 months ago
Re: Let's just face reality.....	OniMirage	5 months ago
Re: Let's just face reality.....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: Let's just face reality.....	idiotekniQues	5 months ago
The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago	1
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	secretworld	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	secretworld	5 months ago	1
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Big Ga	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	daddyo	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Big Ga	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	amtberg	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	RicksAstro	5 months ago
Re: The biggest critics of the 12-35mm....	papillon_65	5 months ago
Just a thought.	Jeff Tokayer	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	bluelemmy	5 months ago	1
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	papillon_65	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens	amtberg	5 months ago
I used prime lenses only, if I can	Micromegas777	5 months ago
Re: I used prime lenses only, if I can	Shirozina	5 months ago
Re: I used prime lenses only, if I can	Big Ga	5 months ago
Re: I used prime lenses only, if I can	idiotekniQues	5 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Insensitive composition..	86
Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	67
The Weekly 4/3 DSLR Images 13 06 17	60
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	53
Leica M Monochrom vs DP2 Merril in a BW ...	51
*Weekly Wildlife Thread: June 16 - 22*	48
A good cat picture with the Olympus 17mm 1.8 ...	45
Olympus alternative to Lumix 12-35???	44
Ruined nex	42
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	42
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	39
Uninspiring performance of Nikon 105mm VR micro	39
New rumour on SAR	37
e-p5 What's not to love	34
GR — capable camera but stereotyped use	31
Does anyone use X-pro 1 profesionally?	28
VF-4 is a Revelation	27
Harley Davidson 110th anniversary in Rome...	27
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	26
E5 shutter dies ... in the middle of shooting ...	25