12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens

Started Jan 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
sigala1
Senior MemberPosts: 3,349
Like?
Re: 12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens
In reply to sgoldswo, Jan 24, 2013

sgoldswo wrote:

sigala1 wrote:


So you need to explain what is it about the photo that was made better by using the 12-35mm lens over some shmuck who just used the kit lens?

Geez, I said I found it excellent for landscape work and posted an example...

If you want to have a beef about it, the 12-35 is 2mm wider and is both sharper and has more resolution at all apertures. It gives you great flexibility for portrait work too (given its wide aperture) and has great bokeh wide open. What's not to like about that?

You said that, but posted a 1.9 MP image, and many flaws present in a 16 MP image might be masked when the image is so significantly downsized.

I am not convinced, based on the photograph, that a cheap lens couldn't have produced just as good a photo.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow