|
Re: X-trans sensor problem?
In reply to shonxiaohe,
4 months ago
|
shonxiaohe wrote:
Zardoz wrote:
viking79 wrote:
The website is purposefully picking pictures to spin the worst possible light on the situation, over sharpened, with no attempt to reduce the artifacts.Not really, there are plenty of other examples online that show the same issue. For example, look at this at 100%:

if the right panel is out-of-camera and the left panel is lightroom, then I think it is lightroom's problem and that would be a relief.
--
oldcamel
The left image shows pretty wrong processing - there is whole high frequency level missing. Printed it probably looks ok, but then we don't have to bother with x-trans if it is going to be processed like a casio.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 5 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 6 | ||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 |