12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens

Started Jan 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
dav1
Forum MemberPosts: 62
Like?
Re: Thanks good info here
In reply to sigala1, Jan 23, 2013

sigala1 wrote:

Shirozina wrote:

With it's high price tag I was expecting much from this lens on my GH3 but the edge resolution is disappointing under 25mm where my 14-45 is better at a fraction of the price. I shoot mainly at F8 and would expect any wide open edge losses to be resolved when stopped down but doing this on the 12-35 does very little. I was about to buy a 35-100 as well but was stopped when I started to read reports and see tests showing a similar so-so edge performance so this may simply be the design compromise of these lenses. On the plus side it has fast AF, weather sealed, fast aperture, a good solid feel and not bad edge resolution at 35mm. Think I'll sell it unless it's simply a bad copy.

No need to buy this expensive lens for landscape shooting. This will save some people a lot of money.

This lens is optimized for f/2.8 - 4.  If you spend a lot of time outside that range and demand the best results then it's not the right tool.

I have it and like it a lot, but I don't print landscapes at large sizes very often.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow