Sony also admits that 16mm F2.8 is a total failure

Started Jan 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
Tommygun45
Contributing MemberPosts: 972Gear list
Like?
Re: Sony also admits that 16mm F2.8 is a total failure
In reply to Bill McClung, Jan 23, 2013

Bill McClung wrote:

Totally agree. Size is very much a relative thing. Throughout my photographic years, I have gone from Speed Graphics to multiple medium format cameras to various Nikon digital SLRs. I ran a part-time wedding photography business for 24 years. When I saw how good my NEX-7 was, I sold my Nikon D300 and most of the Nikon lenses. My NEX-7 may not be the smallest/lightest camera on the market and I certainly didn't buy it hoping it would fit in my pocket. But, compared to carrying around that D300 and attendant heavy glass, the NEX is a lightweight!

Would I use the NEX-7 to do weddings (informally, as I'm retired from the business)? Take a look at the image below, taken last weekend, and you be the judge. It was taken, hand-held, using the NEX7's in-camera HDR feature.

Maybe I missed something Bill but how does this relate to the OP?

 Tommygun45's gear list:Tommygun45's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Sony E 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow