40mm f2.8 STM... why not?

Started Dec 31, 2012 | Discussions thread
JackM
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,830Gear list
Like?
Because
In reply to Atoche, Jan 23, 2013

I'd rather put the money towards the new 35/2 IS.  Twice as fast, and 35mm is "just right" on FF.  And 56mm on APS-C is more versatile than 64mm.

But I guess if another $650 is going to break you, then the 40/2.8 is a great value.  Probably better than the 50/1.8 with its spotty AF.

 JackM's gear list:JackM's gear list
Sigma DP2 Merrill Fujifilm X100S Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow