Forum indexOff TopicChange forum

Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

Great Bustard

Forum Pro • Posts: 15,824

Like?

Classic! (nt)

In reply to Brian D. Schneider, 4 months ago

Brian D. Schneider wrote:

CFynn wrote:

ljfinger wrote:

Well, look at "creation science" for a totally untrustworthy area of "science".)

Their faith in a literal interpretation of Biblical allegories and myths blinds them to reason. With that kind of faith any straw of putative evidence proves their point and overcomes a mountain of evidence against them.

--
Brian Schneider
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6115/6285300710_0fcee72bb1_m.jpg

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhD4	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Cane	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Roger99	4 months ago	1
I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	paul_kew	4 months ago	4
Re: I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Disconnect	CraigWestly	4 months ago	10
Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	CraigWestly	4 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhD4	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Alex Zetetic	4 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago	3
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago
Since you missed it the first time...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Sante Patate	4 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
Responses from the Labs	PhilPreston3072	3 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	heinzguderian	3 months ago	1
Re: Responses from the Labs	bobn2	3 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	Great Bustard	3 months ago
A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Great Bustard	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	3 months ago	2
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	bobn2	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	3 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs - guaranteed to fail	sherwoodpete	3 months ago
Third letter says it all...	lol101	3 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
A little more on this..	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
The FOX "News" of science	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	4 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	4 months ago	2
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	bobn2	4 months ago
If creationists could see themselves	Brian D. Schneider	4 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Bookmarked...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Bookmarked...	boggis the cat	4 months ago	1
hey Craig	edwardaneal	4 months ago
See link	CraigWestly	4 months ago
Re: See link	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Another forgery ...	Sante Patate	4 months ago	4
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	4 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	4 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	bobn2	4 months ago	1
when Cold Fusion was a hot topic	Leo360	4 months ago	1
Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	4 months ago	1
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	4 months ago	1
Jericho is 11,000 Years Old	KEVZPHOTOS	4 months ago
Portraiture	sherwoodpete	4 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	Roger99	4 months ago
You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
but	edwardaneal	4 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
Re: but	edwardaneal	4 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
Grasping at straws...	CFynn	4 months ago	3
How it really happened :)	Brian D. Schneider	4 months ago	2
Re: How it really happened :)	ljfinger	4 months ago
Classic! (nt)	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Grasping at straws...	Roger99	4 months ago	2
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	RossAndrew	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	4 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	bobn2	4 months ago	4
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	bobn2	4 months ago	4
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	4 months ago
I keep saying...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
When I was a kid	Chato	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Alex Zetetic	4 months ago	1
As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	Marianne Oelund	4 months ago
Re: As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	bobn2	4 months ago
What a joke	rhlpetrus	4 months ago	4
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Don_Campbell	4 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	peevee1	4 months ago
Still have a hard time explaining how .....	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	bobn2	4 months ago	1
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	peevee1	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	4 months ago
Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	4 months ago	2
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	4 months ago	1
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Roger99	4 months ago	1
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	sherwoodpete	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	richardplondon	3 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	4 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Why Canon made 1Dx best specification ... II	107
I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	85
My first wedding with OMD	74
Leica entering m4/3?	61
Is Apple getting people by their brain-balls?	54
can you tell the IQ/ISO difference game: ...	53
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	48
2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7	41
Inconceivable! Nikon can't repair my 80-200 AFS!	40
Just returned my 80-400mm VR AF-S lens	40
Panasonic G6. It really has an old, bad sensor?	40
Would you take your D800E and lenses on a trip ...	40
Pentax — a Japanese Leica? Not really ...	39
Photographer = Loner?	36
What might go wrong with GX2	34
Decision making on starting over...	33
Advice needed - Computer for Photo Editing	32
What's the status of the RED problem with ...	30
Smallest case/bag for X-E1	30
What companies should Sigma buy in coming years?	30