Forum indexOff TopicChange forum

Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

Brian D. Schneider

Forum Pro • Posts: 11,685

Like?

How it really happened :)

In reply to CFynn, 5 months ago

CFynn wrote:

ljfinger wrote:

Well, look at "creation science" for a totally untrustworthy area of "science".)

Their faith in a literal interpretation of Biblical allegories and myths blinds them to reason. With that kind of faith any straw of putative evidence proves their point and overcomes a mountain of evidence against them.

--
Brian Schneider
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6115/6285300710_0fcee72bb1_m.jpg

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhD4	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Cane	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Roger99	5 months ago	1
I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	paul_kew	5 months ago	4
Re: I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Disconnect	CraigWestly	5 months ago	10
Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	CraigWestly	5 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhD4	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Alex Zetetic	5 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago	3
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago
Since you missed it the first time...	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Sante Patate	5 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
Responses from the Labs	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	heinzguderian	4 months ago	1
Re: Responses from the Labs	Bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	Great Bustard	4 months ago
A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	4 months ago	2
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Bobn2	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs - guaranteed to fail	sherwoodpete	4 months ago
Third letter says it all...	lol101	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
A little more on this..	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
The FOX "News" of science	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	5 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	5 months ago	2
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Bobn2	5 months ago
If creationists could see themselves	Brian D. Schneider	5 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Bookmarked...	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Bookmarked...	boggis the cat	5 months ago	1
hey Craig	edwardaneal	5 months ago
See link	CraigWestly	5 months ago
Re: See link	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Another forgery ...	Sante Patate	5 months ago	4
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	5 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	5 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
when Cold Fusion was a hot topic	Leo360	5 months ago	1
Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	5 months ago	1
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	5 months ago	1
Jericho is 11,000 Years Old	KEVZPHOTOS	5 months ago
Portraiture	sherwoodpete	5 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	Roger99	5 months ago
You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
but	edwardaneal	5 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Re: but	edwardaneal	5 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Grasping at straws...	CFynn	5 months ago	3
How it really happened :)	Brian D. Schneider	5 months ago	2
Re: How it really happened :)	ljfinger	5 months ago
Classic! (nt)	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Grasping at straws...	Roger99	5 months ago	2
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	RossAndrew	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	5 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Bobn2	5 months ago	4
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	Bobn2	5 months ago	4
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	5 months ago
I keep saying...	Great Bustard	5 months ago
When I was a kid	Chato	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Alex Zetetic	5 months ago	1
As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	Marianne Oelund	5 months ago
Re: As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	Bobn2	5 months ago
What a joke	rhlpetrus	5 months ago	4
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Don_Campbell	5 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	peevee1	5 months ago
Still have a hard time explaining how .....	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	peevee1	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	5 months ago
Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	5 months ago	2
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	5 months ago	1
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Roger99	5 months ago	1
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	sherwoodpete	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	richardplondon	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	5 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Insensitive composition..	86
Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	75
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	55
Leica M Monochrom vs DP2 Merril in a BW ...	53
New rumour on SAR	51
*Weekly Wildlife Thread: June 16 - 22*	48
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	45
Uninspiring performance of Nikon 105mm VR micro	43
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	39
e-p5 What's not to love	38
VF-4 is a Revelation	31
Does anyone use X-pro 1 profesionally?	28
Which lens/ lenses to carry?	28
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	27
E5 shutter dies ... in the middle of shooting ...	27
Harley Davidson 110th anniversary in Rome...	27
$2000 mft Budget	27
Lightzone is back and Open source!	25
FZ200 airshow #6: Panasonic TC, and ...	24
Many Worlds	24