Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhD4	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Cane	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Roger99	5 months ago	1
I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	paul_kew	5 months ago	4
Re: I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Disconnect	CraigWestly	5 months ago	10
Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	CraigWestly	5 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhD4	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Alex Zetetic	5 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago	3
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago
Since you missed it the first time...	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Sante Patate	5 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
Responses from the Labs	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	heinzguderian	4 months ago	1
Re: Responses from the Labs	Bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	Great Bustard	4 months ago
A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	4 months ago	2
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Bobn2	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	4 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs - guaranteed to fail	sherwoodpete	4 months ago
Third letter says it all...	lol101	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Bobn2	5 months ago
A little more on this..	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
The FOX "News" of science	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	5 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	5 months ago	2
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Bobn2	5 months ago
If creationists could see themselves	Brian D. Schneider	5 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Bobn2	5 months ago
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Bookmarked...	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Bookmarked...	boggis the cat	5 months ago	1
hey Craig	edwardaneal	5 months ago
See link	CraigWestly	5 months ago
Re: See link	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Another forgery ...	Sante Patate	5 months ago	4
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	5 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	5 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
when Cold Fusion was a hot topic	Leo360	5 months ago	1
Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	5 months ago	1
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	5 months ago	1
Jericho is 11,000 Years Old	KEVZPHOTOS	5 months ago
Portraiture	sherwoodpete	5 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	Roger99	5 months ago
You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
but	edwardaneal	5 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Re: but	edwardaneal	5 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Grasping at straws...	CFynn	5 months ago	3
How it really happened :)	Brian D. Schneider	5 months ago	2
Re: How it really happened :)	ljfinger	5 months ago
Classic! (nt)	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Grasping at straws...	Roger99	5 months ago	2
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	5 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	RossAndrew	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	5 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Bobn2	5 months ago	4
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	5 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	Bobn2	5 months ago	4
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	5 months ago
I keep saying...	Great Bustard	5 months ago
When I was a kid	Chato	5 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Alex Zetetic	5 months ago	1
As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	Marianne Oelund	5 months ago
Re: As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	Bobn2	5 months ago
What a joke	rhlpetrus	5 months ago	4
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Don_Campbell	5 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	peevee1	5 months ago
Still have a hard time explaining how .....	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Bobn2	5 months ago	1
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	peevee1	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	5 months ago
Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	5 months ago	2
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	5 months ago	1
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Roger99	5 months ago	1
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Bobn2	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	sherwoodpete	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	5 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	richardplondon	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	5 months ago

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	69
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	66
If I owned an NEX-3 or NEX-5 variant, THIS is ...	63
New rumour on SAR	60
Why 'Sony' not taken seriously?	57
$2000 mft Budget	50
Excellent IQ from Fuji X : show me.	44
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	41
GF6 gets DxOmarked	40
Why no more CCD sensors?	39
OM-D E-M5 after 1 (one) year owner reports	38
All Shots are soft 7D	37
SL1: Urban wildlife up close	36
post process this image	34
Purchasing opinion	30
Photographylife's 80-400 af-s review up	29
Next Pentax release (september) choose ONE option	29
Do I tell my friend they suck?	29
New Sony mirrorless incompatible with NEX?	28
Comparison FZ200, Lx 7, Sony rx100	27