Yeah, the 16-50mm kit lens is awful

Started Jan 21, 2013 | Discussions thread
franzel
Contributing MemberPosts: 772
Like?
Re: Yeah, the 16-50mm kit lens is awful
In reply to WoodWorks, Jan 21, 2013

WoodWorks wrote:

In that situation, I'm shooting for pleasure, not to wrest every last photon onto every pixel on the sensor. Sure, image quality is important to me, but only up to a point. If I come home with one image that delights my eye, I'm happy. That concept seems lost on some here.

David

-- hide signature --

It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows
--Epictetus

Fair enough.

But the title of the thread suggests you consider the 1650 to be a good performer . What is it, good enough for snapshots, 'up to a point' , and all that, or is it a good lens, period ?

It's true, you can't teach a man what he thinks he already knows - do you know what a good lens is ?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow