|
Re: What exactly is the advantage of constant aperture in a zoom lens?
In reply to rogerstpierre,
4 months ago
|
rogerstpierre wrote:
To me it's pretty obvious. The longer the FL the more speed you need. Non constant aperture = slower speed when you actually need more speed. Not a good idea.
--
Roger
So true.
If 18-135 had reversed f3.5-5.6, it would be an unbeatable lens! Not the speed, but the DOF.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 |