Do you think the image of SD14(SD15/DP1/2) is cleaner than that of SD1m(DP1m/2m) ?

Started Jan 12, 2013 | Questions thread
xpatUSA
Senior MemberPosts: 3,525Gear list
Like?
Re: SD-1 is cleaner, but you need to expose differently
In reply to Kendall Helmstetter Gelner, Jan 21, 2013

I don't know about Merrill's but SD10's and, according to Arvo, SD14's have a separate saturation value for each channel embedded in the metadata of the X3F file. Approx 6500 on my SD10. BUT, if you deliberately saturate the sensor then the X3F data can be up around 10000! So, there's quite a bit of headroom over what Sigma considers "saturated". Therefore, exposure beyond "right" is feasible but presumably gives non-linear highlights and a higher possibility of individual channel clipping.

In one of their early papers, F7 sensor I think, Foveon said that the well capacity is 77,000-e but 44,000-e is preferred for better linearity - a clue perhaps?

-- hide signature --

Regards,
Ted
Foveon F7X3-C9110

 xpatUSA's gear list:xpatUSA's gear list
Sigma SD9 Sigma SD10 Sigma SD14 +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
YesNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow