
|
Re: Sean...
In reply to daddyo,
5 months ago
|
daddyo wrote:
You're right about the eyes -- she was a very pretty lady:-)
As far as the 35-100mm, one thing that impressed me was that AF was both instant and accurate. I wasn't initially sure how fast the lens would focus on my E-M5, but that is no longer a concern.
This lens will really come in handy next month as I travel to Orlando to shoot another large corporate conference. A large part of that shoot will involve shooting ambient light educational sessions in dimly lit conference rooms. The size, clarity and speed of this lens will be a godsend!
I also am about to unload a fair amount of DSLR gear:-D
God Bless,
Greg
www.imagismphotos.com
www.mccroskery.zenfolio.com
www.pbase.com/daddyo
I greg, thanks for your comments, and for showing your lighting setup. I'm playing with lights at home, and any new thing I learn is most welcome
I question for you: you wrote you intend to shoot a dimly lit event with the 2.8 panasonic zooms. Are you so confident in the high iso capabilities of the OM-D?
I'm loving the little nimble camera, but I find that even f1.8 often just doesn't cut it, and I don't really like what I see over iso800.
Do you find it works ok for you at higher isos?
Many thanks,
Lory
--
'The human race is a race of cowards. And I'm not only marching in that procession, but carrying a banner.'
Mark Twain
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | 6 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |