16-35 F4 vs. Tokina 16-28mm 2.8?

Started Jan 17, 2013 | Discussions thread
imac2001
Regular MemberPosts: 374
Like?
Re: 16-35 F4 vs. Tokina 16-28mm 2.8?
In reply to kiirokurisu, Jan 19, 2013

kiirokurisu wrote:

My very opinionated view is that the Nikon is far more versatile. Can use filters, wider zoom range, weather sealed and the VR is superb. I've done handheld landscape shots at 18mm with shutter speeds of 1/5 sec that came out sharp. I wouldn't discount the extra stop of light on the Tokina for shooting moving subjects, but to me that is a fairly niche use (and I would use a MUCH faster lens for that anyway, something like a f1.4 or 1.8 prim

The Tokina is also weather sealed FYI.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow