70-200 VRII vs. Tamron 70-300 VC

Started Jan 14, 2013 | Discussions thread
nikkorwatcher
Contributing MemberPosts: 684
Like?
Re: My Thoughts......
In reply to marike6, Jan 16, 2013

marike6 wrote:

So, if you've only used the 70-200 f4 once, how do you feel you are qualified to make wild proclamations like "The Tamron 70-300 VC outpeforms the f4 lens"?

This whole stuff is getting a bit loony, I wouldn't be surprised if that "bigger brother" 70-200 f2.8 was edited into the exif details of photos just to give some kind of cred to extravagant assertions. So what if this thing is quite sharp at f5, 200mm? Still not f4 is it? You also pay more for build & handling on the Nikkor.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Wow~New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow