
|
Are digital cameras as economical as film.
5 months ago
|
Before digital cameras all you had to do was change film emulsions, when new ones became available, to improve IQ.
Now one has to invest in a new camera when an improved sensor comes to market.
Just sold my D5000 & a lens for about $200 less than what I paid for the pair 3 years ago.
Thats about 15 rolls of film, or five rolls per year. I usually used more, many more, than 15 rolls of film per year. When I bought my first digital camera I estimated it would take 5 years to pay for it in terms of film. It looks like their considerably more cost effective than originally thought.
Now all I have to do is convince my wife that I'm saving money by buying new cameras and selling the old ones.
--
Canon A2E, Sony R1, Panny TZ5, Nikon D5000, & NEX C3/Zeiss 24mm E Lens
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |