Simple Question - Does the 5R produce photos as good as the old 5N does?

DtEW wrote:

You guys are failing to account for the fact that the samples from the 6 are more-likely-than-not from the SEL1650, which everyone knows is a more-compromised lens, being a pancake and quite full of barrel distortion that is corrected electronically. As a recent thread referring to a Roger Cicala blog entry made clear, both in-camera and PP distortion correction often comes at the cost of resolution.

I would be willing to bet that with the same lens, there would be no detectable difference in image quality.