Do you think the image of SD14(SD15/DP1/2) is cleaner than that of SD1m(DP1m/2m) ?

Started Jan 12, 2013 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Senior MemberPosts: 5,834Gear list
Re: The Clark Article is Simply Wrong
In reply to Roland Karlsson, Jan 14, 2013

Roland Karlsson wrote:

He makes two errors in the article though.He is only talking about pixel peeping. He ignore that the more pixels you have, the higher pixel density you get when printing. Then you get averaging over more pixels, the more pixels you have. And then you get back (most of) the dynamic range and S/N you lost. Even for pixel peeping, there is no limit.
You can make the well depth larger. You can have some kind of clever dynamic range enhancement. Both improving S/N ratio.

Looks like we're approaching agreement - I do agree that down-sampling, properly done, can improve IQ.

As far as S/N ratio is concerned,  I'm not certain that well-depth can simply be increased for a Foveon sensor because it's layers have to be at specific depths:

Foveon 14X3DP1

As to "some kind of clever dynamic range enhancement", can't really respond to such speculation - sorry.

-- hide signature --


 xpatUSA's gear list:xpatUSA's gear list
Sigma SD10 Sigma SD14 Sigma SD1 Merrill Sigma 50mm F2.8 EX DG Macro Sigma 8-16mm F4.5-5.6 DC HSM +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow