Winning 2012 National Geographic Pro Photo Contest with Fujifilm X-Pro1 Locked

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
This thread is locked.
Austin101
Senior MemberPosts: 1,276
Re: Winning 2012 National Geographic Pro Photo Contest with Fujifilm X-Pro1
In reply to Ryan Williams, 4 months ago

Ryan Williams wrote:

Austin101 wrote:

Ryan Williams wrote:

Austin101 wrote:

ArtByLukeBennett wrote:

Austin101 wrote:

ArtByLukeBennett wrote:

It was hardly cheating. He just hadn't read the rules properly. There was no deliberate intent to deceive.

I'm not a fan of lots of PP, I think a good photo shouldn't need tinkering with, but minor touch ups are fine, as long as the photo retains its original look and naturalism.

--
http://www.artbylukebennett.blogspot.co.uk/

hardly cheating!! he digitally removed an object from the photo

so its ok by you to add/remove objects digitally and still call it a photograph? once you start doing that it becomes digital art, if your photographs an't good enough then cheat right?

it's cheating and he knew full well that he was cheating, he just didn't think he'd get caught

I'm saying, if you read his blog post (which it sounds like you haven't), it's incredibly obvious the intent to deceive was not there. Clearly had he read the rules properly he wouldn't have submitted the version with the bag removed.

And in a separate point, it's a far cry from some subtle, natural looking touch ups that don't in anyway change the feel or nature of a photo or its story, to that of digital art.

--
http://www.artbylukebennett.blogspot.co.uk/

oh yeah, the blog he wrote after being caught, no I've not read it and why would I waste my time reading a cheaters lame excuse, fact is that if the idiot does know that difference between photography and digital art then he shouldn't be entering photography competitions.

so I guess he's a cheat and a liar

You refuse to even read the article, so what exactly do you know about this situation? Nothing. Take your ignorant anus out of here, your childish insults and behaviour aren't welcome.

I know he cheated but I don't feel the need to read his excuses, harsh? its a tough world pup

As I said before, touching up is absolutely pervasive in photography and always has been. Sometimes it's a zit or a red eye that's removed, sometimes it's a bag that's blown into frame. If a photographer (or often subject) would prefer it be removed, that doesn't suddenly make something not a photograph.

I mean by all means you can disagree with that definition, but based on your behaviour in this thread I doubt anyone's going to lend any credence to a thing you say. Vitriolic attacks against a guy you know nothing about who's freely admitted he messed up and explained what happened are unnecessary and borderline disgusting to see in a community that's generally reasonably mature.

It's not like the guy was even trying to deny he'd broken the rules, indeed his post was clearly intended to be more of a cautionary tale than anything else. Of course you wouldn't know because you haven't actually read it, seemingly preferring to spend the few minutes it'd have taken you filling this thread with poison instead.

well if you believe what he wrote then fine but you only know his side of the story, me I don't believe cheaters, the whole thing reads like a poor excuse for being caught cheating.

removing red-eye is totally different to removing a zit,

Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow