|
Re: By Design
In reply to Funderadus,
4 months ago
|
Funderadus wrote:
Steen Bay wrote:
You should be glad instead, 15 sec, iso80 will collect 3x more light/photons than 5 sec, iso400, and will therefore give you better IQ. If 15 sec, iso80 gives a JPEG that's to dark, then just shoot RAW and increase the brightness in the RAW converter.
Well, I was not precise with the numbers, I am sorry. My point was: now I am forced to use long exposures while it would be ok to use much faster exposures with some noise in the picture. It is enthusiasts camera and enthusiasts do now what consequences result from using hi iso and long exposure.
OK, but still, if you shoot RAW, then it doesn't really matter. Let's say that you want to shoot at 5 sec, iso400. That's not possible (for whatever reason), but then you can just shoot at 5 sec, iso80 instead and push the exposure/brightness a bit more than two stops afterwards in the RAW converter. The final result will be pretty much the same as if shooting at 5 sec, iso400. You are not forced to use a longer shutterspeed than you want to. But on the other hand, a longer exposure will collect more light and give you better IQ, so why not?
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |