Forum indexCanon SLR Lens TalkChange forum

Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread

Forum

David Naylor

Contributing Member • Posts: 554

Like?

Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')

In reply to sdyue, 4 months ago

sdyue wrote:

Loads and loads.

Well ... I'm not really sure what you're trying to get at. Of course there are not exact equivalents of all lenses in both directions ...

(And when I wrote equivalent in the thread title I didn't mean it in the exact, spec for spec way.)

Don't you think it is strange there is no f/2.8 standard zoom with IS for full frame?

hmmm... if you work, how difficult can either be, really? and if not, why ask...?

What's with the attitude? I asked because I was curious how other people think about this.

--
_______________
http://davidnaylor.org/photography/
http://davidnaylor.org/blog/

Edited 4 months ago by David Naylor

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	David Naylor	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MAC	4 months ago	3
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago	2
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago	3
or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	MAC	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	oklaphotog	4 months ago	2
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	oklaphotog	4 months ago	1
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Sovern	4 months ago	2
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	oklaphotog	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: or, get simple dof calculator for iphone	MAC	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	NetMage	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MAC	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago	3
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago	2
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago	2
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago	3
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago	1
A little experiment	tim73	4 months ago	2
Re: A little experiment	David Naylor	4 months ago
you don't understand	tko	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Tachikoma	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Um, no.	Great Bustard	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MAC	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	photonius	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago	2
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MAC	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	AOKH	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago	1
"Apertures" and "values of light"	Great Bustard	4 months ago	3
Re: "Apertures" and "values of light"	Sovern	4 months ago	1
Speaking of "ridiculous"...	Great Bustard	4 months ago	4
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
On "aperture"	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: On "aperture"	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	G Rothwell	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Does "confusing and unnecessary"...	MAC	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	photonius	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	photonius	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	gavin	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Sovern	4 months ago	1
"According to most in this thread"...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago	2
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
What has been confusing to me in this thread...	chironNYC	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	chironNYC	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	MAC	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	MAC	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	MAC	4 months ago	1
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	Donald Duck	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	Y Hafting	4 months ago
Re: What has been confusing to me in this thread...	chironNYC	4 months ago
correction	brightcolours	4 months ago
I hear a bell ringing.	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	MAC	4 months ago
Re: "According to most in this thread"...	MAC	4 months ago
You can lead a horse to water...	Great Bustard	4 months ago	1
Re: You can lead a horse to water...	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: You can lead a horse to water...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	tonyjr	4 months ago
Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	sdyue	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	David Naylor	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	tim73	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	BozillaNZ	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Great Bustard	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	BozillaNZ	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	BozillaNZ	4 months ago
Now, now...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	jitteringjr	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Sovern	4 months ago
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Great Bustard	4 months ago	2
Re: Why no APS-C equiv. to EF 24-70/2.8? (same 'dilemma')	Lenni Vilen	4 months ago
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	KLO82	4 months ago
Hey what happened?	brightcolours	4 months ago	2
Re: Hey what happened?	MAC	4 months ago
Here comes the "equivalence" troops again	Howard	4 months ago
Good, you are partly understanding it.	brightcolours	4 months ago
Baloney	Howard	4 months ago
I see	brightcolours	4 months ago
Re: Here comes the "equivalence" troops again	MOD schmegg	4 months ago
Re: Here comes the "equivalence" troops again	MAC	4 months ago	1
Re: Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?	Christoph Stephan	4 months ago
hmmm?	brightcolours	4 months ago
Switch to Nikon, Their FF can take FX od DX lenses.	Rick Knepper	4 months ago
Besides, you have this whole equivalency thing backwards.	Rick Knepper	4 months ago
Re: Besides, you have this whole equivalency thing backwards.	tonyjr	4 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 lens not so hot.	93
OH MY GOD THE GX2 OH MY GOD	60
Micro Four Thirds body deflation	58
Firmware upgrade causes AF slow down on 18-55!	49
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	49
My first wedding with OMD	47
Leica Mini M	45
Does DPreview waste your time, too?	44
I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	42
When size matters (D800 pixel count)	38
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	37
Should I buy a NEX?	34
A few observations.	34
Leica entering m4/3?	30
2 Sigmas (19&30), or 20mm 1.7	29
GR and X100s side by side shots	29
<<<< Challenge 209: Results!!! >>>>	29
Hassy's Lunar gets real	28
New Forum?	26
Decision making on starting over...	26