thinking of OMD, body only... but a lens is needed

Started Jan 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
saulgood
New MemberPosts: 1
Like?
thinking of OMD, body only... but a lens is needed
Jan 11, 2013

a bit of dilema, hoping folks with more experience might be able assist.

basically, i'm pausing at picking up the OMD with the 12-50 lens kit. thinking of taking advantage of the $150 rebate, going body only($960), and getting the 17 f2.8. ($180 after rebate). doing the math: $1140 (17mm)  vs $1219 (12-50mm).

i know that i would rarely use the telephoto capability of the kit lens. i would prefer a wider angle lens,  so i'm more concerned with whether i might be, you know, missing something by going with the 17mm lens. that is, does the 17mm prime out-perform the kit lens at 17mm? my thinking is that even though it's not super-fast/bright at f.28, it oughta' be somewhat 'better' than the kit lens. am i even remotely correct in thinking this?

thanks in advance for any thoughts.

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow