QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory
connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com
NewsReviewsBuying GuideSample ImagesArticlesCamerasLensesPhonesPrintersSoftwareForumsGalleriesChallenges
Forum indexCanon SLR Lens TalkChange forum

new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
MICHAEL_61
MICHAEL_61
Senior Member • Posts: 2,121
Like?
If I could afford it I'd...
In reply to joger, 5 months ago

joger wrote:

MICHAEL_61 wrote:

I'd say for real-life practical purposes Sigma beats the 300mm L - which I couldn't afford anyway.

oh really?

If you could afford your statement would be different?

(have you ever tried one? I've bought the 100-300 f/4.0 APO and is was mediocre to say the least)

If I could afford it I'd buy the Sigma 200-500mm F2.8 APO EX DG of course

100-300/4 is rubbish compared to 120-300/2.8 - they are not in the same category mate.

As for the 120-300 - it is a very sharp and versatile lens with great colour and contrast, see more samples:

http://lordofthelens.zenfolio.com/p665456386/e51f38dde

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted byWhen
new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
kjbkix
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
USB dock
dotweb
5 months ago
Re: USB dock
jckk
5 months ago
Re: USB dock
j2l3m7
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Thorbard
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
quatpat
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
quatpat
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
ed rader
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Howard
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Thorbard
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
Thorbard
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?
joger
5 months ago
new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!
joger
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!
joger
5 months ago
It is 2.8, sorry!
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: It is 2.8, sorry!
joger
5 months ago
Re: It is 2.8, sorry!
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: It is 2.8, sorry!
joger
5 months ago
samples
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: samples
ScottD1964
5 months ago
Re: samples
joger
5 months ago
Re: samples
joger
5 months ago
Re: samples
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: samples
joger
5 months ago
Re: samples
joger
5 months ago
If I could afford it I'd...
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...
joger
5 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...
joger
5 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
dotweb
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
joger
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
joger
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
dotweb
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
joger
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
grammieb14
5 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Hi MICHAEL_61
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
Re: Hi MICHAEL_61
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: Hi MICHAEL_61
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
They are both the same optics...
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
grammieb14
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
grammieb14
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
grammieb14
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
grammieb14
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
Does this mean...
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: 300 and 120-300 samples..
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
joger
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
12-300 filter?
foskram
5 months ago
Re: 12-300 filter?
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: 12-300 filter?
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Does this mean...
joger
5 months ago
what monopod?
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: what monopod?
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
athletics...
MICHAEL_61
5 months ago
Re: athletics...
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Sigma needs better planning
RedFox88
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
dotweb
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
RedFox88
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
joger
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
dotweb
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
joger
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
RedFox88
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
dotweb
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
joger
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
bigfatron
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
joger
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
joger
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
Wyville
5 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning
clevername
5 months ago
The "old" 120-300 f/2.8 is just a reasonably priced lens..
Christoph v Ballmoos
5 months ago
Re: The "old" 120-300 f/2.8 is just a reasonably priced lens..
Amateur Sony Shooter
5 months ago
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow
Search on dpreview.com
Not a member? Register
dpreview TV
Featured news stories
dpreview.com
connect.dpreview.com
gearshop.dpreview.com
Editorial content
Product database
Community
About us   Write for us   FAQ   Feedback   Interest-Based Ads   Privacy   Legal
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
Mobile site