new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?

Started Jan 7, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Senior MemberPosts: 2,156
If I could afford it I'd...
In reply to joger, Jan 11, 2013

joger wrote:

MICHAEL_61 wrote:

I'd say for real-life practical purposes Sigma beats the 300mm L - which I couldn't afford anyway.

oh really?

If you could afford your statement would be different?

(have you ever tried one? I've bought the 100-300 f/4.0 APO and is was mediocre to say the least)

If I could afford it I'd buy the Sigma 200-500mm F2.8 APO EX DG of course

100-300/4 is rubbish compared to 120-300/2.8 - they are not in the same category mate.

As for the 120-300 - it is a very sharp and versatile lens with great colour and contrast, see more samples:

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow