3
|
Re: That was my point....
In reply to Giant Tsunami,
4 months ago
|
Giant Tsunami wrote:
tex wrote:
I did read the exif. yes, the exposures were the same in terms of fstops and speed. Nevertheless they came out different, probably function of the iso difference (even though they both show the "same"), because in digital cameras that's a processing difference, really.
--
tex_andrews
"Photography is the product of complete alienation" Marcel Proust
"I would like to see photography make people despise painting until something else will make photography unbearable." Marcel Duchamp
Exactly, now if you could match up the exposure perfectly by raising a99 iso, you would end up with the same discrepency that DXO shows. Why did we need to go through all this to get to the truth?
Then, you must be blind or you never had taken enough pictures to have enough experiences to be able to tell that the difference in brightness in the pictures was not even larger than 1/3 of a stop.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | 6 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 5 | ||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | 6 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
