|
Re: SLRGear tests the 70-200/4 VR
In reply to Gabbro,
4 months ago
|
Gabbro wrote:
jhinkey wrote:
Gabbro wrote:
It is an excellent lens, but not quite match the 70-200 mm 2.8 VRII. If I don't already have the 2.8 VRII and 70-300 mm VR, this will definitely be one.
--
http://lh5.google.com/gabbro17/RVt_-dYAABI/AAAAAAAAABU/1uxFdVvlq3I/s144/Gabbro.jpg
Well then SLR gear got a dud of a 70-200/4 because mine at 200mm is every bit as good in the center as my 70-200/2.8 VRII and is a bit better in the edges and far corners than the f/2.8 VR II version. This is on a D800.
Could have been YOU got a dud 70-200 VRII?
--
http://lh5.google.com/gabbro17/RVt_-dYAABI/AAAAAAAAABU/1uxFdVvlq3I/s144/Gabbro.jpg
John's experience is consistent with all of the early casual reviews of the new lens, which lends cred to his suggestion.
Denis
--
I have made this letter a rather long one, only because I didn't have the leisure to make it shorter. Blaise Pascal, 1623-1662
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 1 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 3 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
