|
Re: Will the X100s produce better images than the X100?
In reply to Joachim Gerstl,
5 months ago
|
Joachim Gerstl wrote:
Owning both: X100 and X-Pro 1 I say yes because the sensor is better. There is a 1 stop advantage in high ISO shots and a slightly higher per pixel sharpness because of no AA filter.
It is better but the X100 is already very good. If you own a X100 you do not need to upgrade just because of IQ.
I don't own either at the moment. Just wondering whether the X100s will be worth paying double the price of an X100. Althought I fear it is something I have to figure out myself. Spending £500 on a camera is easier to get away with than £1000!
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
