QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory

connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com

News ReviewsBuying GuideSample Images Articles Cameras Lenses Printers Software Forums Galleries Challenges

Forum indexCanon SLR Lens TalkChange forum

new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread

Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee

Veteran Member • Posts: 5,075

Like?

1

Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?

In reply to joger, 4 months ago

My obsolete 120-300 which I'm very pleased with cost me all of 1500 stg. Could've spent three times that.on the canon sine zoom.. Already have the 300 sigma and the increase in quality would not be worth it to me.

--
Níor bhris focal maith fiacail riamh (Irish Gaelic)
A good word never broke a tooth.

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago	1
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	kjbkix	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
USB dock	dotweb	4 months ago
Re: USB dock	jckk	4 months ago
Re: USB dock	j2l3m7	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Thorbard	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	quatpat	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago	1
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	quatpat	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	bigfatron	4 months ago	1
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	ed rader	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Howard	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Thorbard	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	Thorbard	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?	joger	4 months ago
new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago	1
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!	joger	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 - awesome!	joger	4 months ago
It is 2.8, sorry!	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: It is 2.8, sorry!	joger	4 months ago
Re: It is 2.8, sorry!	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: It is 2.8, sorry!	joger	4 months ago
samples	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: samples	ScottD1964	4 months ago
Re: samples	joger	4 months ago
Re: samples	joger	4 months ago
Re: samples	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: samples	joger	4 months ago
Re: samples	joger	4 months ago
If I could afford it I'd...	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...	joger	4 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago	1
Re: If I could afford it I'd...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...	joger	4 months ago
Re: If I could afford it I'd...	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago	1
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	dotweb	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	joger	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	joger	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	dotweb	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	joger	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	grammieb14	4 months ago
Re: Samples here - previous post truncated due to computer glitch	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Hi MICHAEL_61	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago
Re: Hi MICHAEL_61	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: Hi MICHAEL_61	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago
They are both the same optics...	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	grammieb14	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	grammieb14	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	grammieb14	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	grammieb14	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: They are both the same optics...	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago
Does this mean...	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: 300 and 120-300 samples..	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	joger	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
12-300 filter?	foskram	4 months ago
Re: 12-300 filter?	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: 12-300 filter?	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago
Re: Does this mean...	Wyville	4 months ago	1
Re: Does this mean...	joger	4 months ago
what monopod?	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: what monopod?	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
athletics...	MICHAEL_61	4 months ago
Re: athletics...	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Sigma needs better planning	RedFox88	4 months ago	1
Re: Sigma needs better planning	dotweb	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	RedFox88	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	joger	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	dotweb	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	joger	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	RedFox88	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	dotweb	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	joger	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	bigfatron	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	joger	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	joger	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	Wyville	4 months ago
Re: Sigma needs better planning	clevername	4 months ago
The "old" 120-300 f/2.8 is just a reasonably priced lens..	Christoph v Ballmoos	4 months ago	1
Re: The "old" 120-300 f/2.8 is just a reasonably priced lens..	Amateur Sony Shooter	4 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

About us Write for us FAQ Feedback Interest-Based Ads Privacy Legal

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.

Mobile site